❆ The Superstition of Divorce kindle Epub ❤ Author G.K. Chesterton – Alwaysonltd.co.uk


The Superstition of Divorce A good little read As usual Chesterton mixes wit with an uncanny ability to make clear the enduring truths of Christendom Though not a Catholic book per se, Chesterton defends the Catholic position on Marriage and shows how this position is the one taken by all sane persons throughout time Chesterton illustrates how the desire for divorce is not a desire for liberty, but rather a desire for respectability of sin The dissolving of marriage is not the end but merely a symptom of a much great A good little read As usual Chesterton mixes wit with an uncanny ability to make clear the enduring truths of Christendom Though not a Catholic book per se, Chesterton defends the Catholic position on Marriage and shows how this position is the one taken by all sane persons throughout time Chesterton illustrates how the desire for divorce is not a desire for liberty, but rather a desire for respectability of sin The dissolving of marriage is not the end but merely a symptom of a much greater divorce from Christianity most notably Catholic Christianity hmmmmm. The original articles toward the front are typically brilliant Chesterton The chapters he adds in addition to the original articles are good, though perhaps a bit tedious in comparison The thing I found primarily fascinating was less his arguments, andthe fact that he saw this as a problem 100 years ago, at a time which many of a conservative bent today look back upon as some sort of golden age But modernity and its individualism at the expense of the family was already doing the destru The original articles toward the front are typically brilliant Chesterton The chapters he adds in addition to the original articles are good, though perhaps a bit tedious in comparison The thing I found primarily fascinating was less his arguments, andthe fact that he saw this as a problem 100 years ago, at a time which many of a conservative bent today look back upon as some sort of golden age But modernity and its individualism at the expense of the family was already doing the destructive work which we now see in fuller fruition This review is adapted from my blog post When you read a hundred year old book dealing with a then contemporary issue, you expect it to be rather dated What you might not expect is for it to be readable, relevant and even prophetic for your own day But if you re reading an author who has a knack for seeing through the fog of rhetoric to the fundamental questions, like Gilbert Keith Chesterton, you should not at all be surprised to be underlining quote This review is adapted from my blog post When you read a hundred year old book dealing with a then contemporary issue, you expect it to be rather dated What you might not expect is for it to be readable, relevant and even prophetic for your own day But if you re reading an author who has a knack for seeing through the fog of rhetoric to the fundamental questions, like Gilbert Keith Chesterton, you should not at all be surprised to be underlining quotes, even lengthy passages, and drawing all kinds of parallels between his arguments and current 21st century debates.I am referring to a booklet that was written in 1920 called The Superstition of Divorce Now the occasion of this booklet is the radical idea of allowing people to divorce their spouses This sounds very strange to our modern ears, since we cannot remember, let alone imagine, a society without legal and common no fault divorce But that very assumption, that our modern way is the best way to structure things, is exactly what Chesterton will have you question.One of the simplest points he makes is that those arguing to legalize divorce do not understand what marriage is And I think it s fair to say many of us don t really know either And the chief thing to say about such reformers of marriage is that they cannot make head or tail of it They do not know what it is, or what it is meant to be, or what its supporters suppose it to be they never look at it, even when they are inside it They do the work that s nearest which is poking holes in the bottom of a boat under the impression that they are digging in a garden This question of what a thing is, and whether it is a garden or a boat, appears to them abstract and academic They have no notion of how large is the idea they attack or how relatively small appear the holes that they pick in it What many of them did know was that marriage was a confinement and a limitation, and it chafed against that powerful liberalizing spirit which still moves today That spirit which sees every fence and every wall as holding slaves in need of emancipation, without stopping to ask if perhaps such structures were useful for keeping harmful things out.The parallels between the liberalizing of marriage laws and the subsequent avalanche of liberalizing that has swept through the West, especially since the sexual revolution and continuing unabated today, forces the reader to stop and consider when and where it will all stop Is there an end goal What does that look like Chesterton had no illusions about the end result of this attack on what he understood to be the foundation of civilizationThis triangle of truisms, of father, mother and child, cannot be destroyed it can only destroy those civilisations which disregard it And in what is perhaps the most prescient statement of this prescient book, he says thisThe obvious effect of frivolous divorce will be frivolous marriage If people can be separated for no reason they will feel it all the easier to be united for no reason There can be no doubt that the onset of no fault divorce has led to a wave of shallow marriages which are themselves all theripe for divorce Knowing that the decision to marry need not be a permanent one, the effect could not be other than to undermine the care and effort involved in making that decision and the determination to making it last.To adapt a Chesterton quote from another of his books, we find ourselves as a society in a situation where the ideal of marriage has not been tried and found wanting it has been found difficult and left untried Marriage today is like a highway to a great and glorious city, but that city is many thousands and thousands of miles away It will take a lifetime of traveling to get there But in the last hundred years we have built off ramps, restaurants, malls, and amusement parks every two miles, with flashing neon signs and free admission And we are shocked that so few couples make it to that great and glorious city I admit it is a weak metaphor I am no Chesterton But perhaps it begins to make a point.Of course in making these arguments and observations, I can hear the objections coming hard and fast from the modern reader It is unthinkable to imagine locking people into unhappy marriages, forced to live with brutes, abusers, and cheaters I admit I have many of the same objections And yet there is something very healthy about listening carefully to the argument that seems so alien It may shed light on just that point in our own moral thinking where we are blind Unless, enlightened progressive moderns that we are, we don t believe we have any blind spots Near the conclusion, he writes this If a man had a hundred houses, there would still behouses than he had days in which to dream of them if a man had a hundred wives, there would still bewomen than he could ever know He would be an insane sultan jealous of the whole human race, and even of the dead and the unborn I believe that behind the art and philosophy of our time there is a considerable element of this bottomless ambition and this unnatural hunger and since in these last words I am touching only lightly on things that would need much larger treatment, I will admit that the rending of the ancient roof of man is probably only a part of such an endless and empty expansion This striking image of a man with a hundred wives being like a jealous sultan speaks loudly to the pornographic age we live in truly a sea of bottomless ambition and unnatural hunger that Chesterton could not have imagined What was only possible for the sultan is now digitally possible for every 13 year old with an internet connection and a harem I mean a hard drive.As one poem says The secret that no one seems able to fathomIn our age of Botox and she bots and atomsThat crystalline stream couldthan the oceanFulfill that desire made apt in proportion.In our age we question and undermine every law, rule, authority, and tradition except for the law, rule, and authority of our desires We have deposed everything that has built our civilization and crowned our desires in its stead Lead us Teach us we say And what do we find That our desires keep growing, shifting, morphing There is a very old bit of wisdom, from a very old book, that argued that our desires could be changed, made new, and purified They could be made apt, in proportion to our actual need, and then we would find what we had been after all along, the true and lasting satisfaction of our desires.I fear that we have a generation of young men who are so lost in a far and distant country of sexual chaos and dysfunction that they will not even be able to stumble upon this truth and perhaps find happiness Why Because that far country never stops, just as one s desires never stop each growing beyond measure and recognition But that is a topic for another day.One last quote, on why the marriage vow is esteemed and respected The soldier is not respected because he is doomed to death, but because he is ready for death and even ready for defeat The married man or woman is not doomed to evil, sickness or poverty but is respected for taking a certain step for better for worse, for richer for poorer, in sickness or in health In short, everybody recognises that there is some ship, large and small, which he ought not to leave, even when he thinks it is sinking Reading this book opened my eyes to the fascinating nature of the marriage vow, and to the idea of a lifelong binding promise It is an idea so large that we do not see it True, there is still some hint in our collective memory of the high honor due to it that we still make a big ceremony for the speaking of this vow, but even there for the most part we pay attention to all the wrong things What a nice dress Such pretty flowers Sermon was a bit long The food was good.Chesterton s point in that last quote is that, of all the institutions known to man, marriage is the most foundational, and therefore most deserving of our honor, and effort, and refusal to give up on it.This view of marriage is a long way in the cultural rear view mirror, barely visible To many, unthinkable.I am not saying we should make divorce illegal I m not convinced it would help much But one thing I am quite sure of, having read this book, is that making divorce legal made it common and making it common made marriage weaker and making marriage weaker led to the implosion of the family and the implosion of the family has not led to the happiness and freedom that was promised when divorce was made legal.No doubt many individuals have been rescued from terrible marriages by legal divorce I do not mourn that, just the opposite But if we take a look around at the state of marriages and families today, we see a desolate wasteland abounding in human misery.Perhaps, at some point, we have lost our way A short piece on divorce, what Mr Chesterton calls a pamphlet He approaches it with an appeal from reason natural law, rather than with any religious argument He isconvoluted than usual in his own words, it s one of hiscrude and sketchy pieces Nevertheless, I still enjoyed his ramblings and clever lines and insights and of course, the glimpse his writings always afford of our age in its childhood stages of lunacy His argument, though necessarily underdeveloped, centers on the A short piece on divorce, what Mr Chesterton calls a pamphlet He approaches it with an appeal from reason natural law, rather than with any religious argument He isconvoluted than usual in his own words, it s one of hiscrude and sketchy pieces Nevertheless, I still enjoyed his ramblings and clever lines and insights and of course, the glimpse his writings always afford of our age in its childhood stages of lunacy His argument, though necessarily underdeveloped, centers on the family as a form of government that threatens the state, and therefore, a supreme target of the state and therefore, the civic permission to divorce Ponderable content I have my Collected Works of Chesterton sitting on my Kindle in case of the emergency that reading for whatever reason loses its luster I m sorry guys, I haven t been reading as much lately due to a variety of things graduating, defending my thesis, house hunting, having a new child, etc But probably the biggest thing was the luxury of working from home the past few weeks it obliterated my regularly scheduled reading time for which I reserve my bus rides With that gone, I hardly get a few I have my Collected Works of Chesterton sitting on my Kindle in case of the emergency that reading for whatever reason loses its luster I m sorry guys, I haven t been reading as much lately due to a variety of things graduating, defending my thesis, house hunting, having a new child, etc But probably the biggest thing was the luxury of working from home the past few weeks it obliterated my regularly scheduled reading time for which I reserve my bus rides With that gone, I hardly get a few pages in Add to that the fact that I hadn t found a book that I really got into, so I had to pull out my emergency Chesterton.I flipped to some of his non fiction, and ended up with this pamphlet on divorce Sounds like a happy topic, right Back in the day, divorce laws were liberalizing battlegrounds, from what I can gather It seems that the specific law in question Chesterton was writing about would have allowed a woman or man to file for divorce in the case of three years absence Chesterton, as usual, writes very wittily on the topic with a very shrewd defense of conservative values that rings very full of common sense His opening argument is the classic conservative position The man, like the mouse, undermines what he cannot understand Because he bumps into a thing, he calls it the nearest obstacle though the obstacle may happen to be he pillar that holds up the whole roof over his head He industriously removes the obstacle and, in return, the obstacle removes him and muchvaluable things than he The discussion of divorce includes a beautiful section on vows that a Latter Day Saint could definitely appreciate Covenants are central to our theology, and perhaps the idea of a vow is slightly different freely chosen, to a larger extent than covenants you can choose to make the covenant, but the terms and conditions are less up to you than in a vow Take this section The idea, or at any rate, the ideal, of the thing called a vow is fairly obvious It is to combine the fixity that goes with finality with the self respect that only goes with freedom.When society lost the centrality of vows, men were a little less free Chesterton paints marriage as family as the only institution that can stand up to ever growing governments They desire the democracy to be sexually fluid, because the making of small nuclei is like the making of small nations Like small nations, they are a nuisance to the mind of imperial scope In short, what they fear, in the most literal sense, is home rule.To me, Chesterton paints the family in a romantic light that the formal language of The Family A Proclamation to the World doesn t capture I think we need a Mormon Chesterton, tbh One that makes it clear that the conservative position doesn t have to be that of a stuffed shirt, accepted blindly from tradition But an intellectually engaging one, one filled with a spirit of adventure, and one that embodies the love that is meant to be central to the gospel British Writer GILBERT KEITH CHESTERTON Expounded Prolifically About His Wide Ranging Philosophies He Is Impossible To Categorize As Liberal Or Conservative, For Instance Across A Wide Variety Of Avenues He Was An Arts Critic, Historian, Playwright, Novelist, Columnist, And Poet His Witty, Humorous Style Earned Him The Title Of The Prince Of Paradox, And His Works Books And Nearly , Essays Remain Among The Most Beloved In The English Language Almost A Century Ago, Chesteron Wrote A Series Of Articles Collected In This Replica Volume Decrying The Rise In Divorce And Exploring, From A Sociological Standpoint, The Impact He Believed It Would Have On Western Civilization His Conclusions Are Seen By Some As Prophetic, But Whether One Agrees With His Cynical Stance Or Not, This Is A Fascinating Work Of Modern Cultural Criticism I had always hoped I would like his books because of his adorable quippy quotes on Pinterest I was deeply disappointed in his full bore lack of logic, his casual racism, and his deeply anti feminist message Should I ever be gifted the great joy of being a girlmom I do not want my beautiful, ferocious, fierce, beautiful daughters to receive this sort of messaging. A convincing read, done with wit and copious ethos as per usual in his writings. Is nog steeds heel relevant helaas.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

About the Author: G.K. Chesterton

Gilbert Keith Chesterton 1874 1936 was born in London, educated at St Paul s, and went to art school at University College London In 1900, he was asked to contribute a few magazine articles on art criticism, and went on to become one of the most prolific writers of all time He wrote a hundred books, contributions to 200 , hundreds of poems, including the epic Ballad of the White Horse, five plays, five novels, and some two hundred short stories, including a popular series featuring the priest detective, Father Brown In spite of his literary accomplishments, he considered himself primarily a journalist He wrote over 4000 newspaper essays, including 30 years worth of weekly columns for the Illustrated London News, and 13 years of weekly columns for the Daily News He also edited his own newspaper, G.K s Weekly.Chesterton was equally at ease with literary and social criticism, history, politics, economics, philosophy, and theology.


Back To Top